TT Family War EXPLODES: Shakira’s Mother Files Lawsuit Against Piqué’s Mom – Accuses Her of “Destroying My Daughter Daily”… And Montserrat’s Furious Phone Call Backfired BADLY 🔥😳 You Won’t Believe What Happened Next!

OFFICIAL: Shakira’s mother has filed a lawsuit against Montserrat Bernabeu, Piqué’s mother, for alleged harassment and defamation against her daughter.

The news broke after the formal filing of a civil lawsuit in which Shakira’s mother requests an investigation into what she considers repeated and damaging conduct, citing a direct impact on the artist’s emotional stability, public reputation, and family peace.

According to the family’s legal team, the legal action is not seeking media confrontation, but rather to establish clear boundaries and obtain a formal retraction, as well as a public apology, which they believe is necessary to repair the damage caused in recent months.

The statement attributed to Shakira’s mother was disseminated by various media outlets, highlighting her profound weariness with what she describes as a persistent smear campaign, and insisting that her priority is protecting her daughter from attacks she considers unjustified.

The document filed with the court details incidents that, according to the plaintiff, constitute verbal harassment and defamation, always under the presumption of guilt, pending the court’s determination of responsibility and evaluation of the evidence presented.

Sources close to the situation indicate that the decision to go to court was made after previous attempts to resolve the conflict privately proved unsuccessful, reinforcing the conviction that a legal response was inevitable.

The case has generated a strong media reaction due to the public notoriety of the families involved, reigniting debates about the boundaries between private life and the constant exposure that accompanies figures in entertainment and sports.

According to reports, Montserrat Bernabeu reacted angrily upon learning of the lawsuit, a reaction that has not been officially confirmed and is described by third parties as an initial emotional outburst.

These accounts also allege that a phone call was made to Shakira, demanding that she withdraw the legal action, a claim that neither party has publicly corroborated to date.

The singer’s alleged response, described as cold and firm, has been interpreted by media analysts as a sign of determination and distance, although there is no official transcript or direct statement confirming its exact content.

Shakira’s representatives have opted for prudence, avoiding fueling speculation and reiterating that any relevant communication will be made through the appropriate legal channels, respecting judicial timelines and procedures.

From a legal perspective, specialists point out that a lawsuit for harassment and defamation requires clear and contextualized evidence, and that the process will allow both parties to exercise their right to defense on equal terms.

The case also highlights the role of families in highly publicized conflicts, where personal tensions can be amplified and take on public dimensions that are difficult to control.

On social media, reactions have been polarized, with messages of support for Shakira and her mother, and others urging caution, emphasizing the importance of not jumping to conclusions before a court ruling.

Cultural observers point out that this episode reflects prolonged strain following highly publicized breakups, where the family environment is drawn into confrontational dynamics that extend beyond the original protagonists.

The lawsuit, it has been indicated, seeks not only potential compensation, but also measures to prevent the recurrence of behaviors considered offensive, reinforcing the idea of ​​protection and reparation rather than punishment.

So far, Montserrat Bernabeu has not issued an official statement, maintaining public silence, which some interpret as a cautious strategy while evaluating the legal steps to take.

Communication experts recommend prudence regarding unverified reports, noting that legal proceedings are often surrounded by rumors that can distort the public perception of the facts.

Meanwhile, Shakira remains focused on her professional and family commitments, avoiding direct statements and maintaining a low profile that contrasts with the intensity of the debate generated.

The maternal figure emerges in this context as a protective axis, demonstrating how public disputes affect not only celebrities, but also their inner circles.

The case’s development now depends on the competent judicial authorities, who will have to assess testimonies, documents, and context to determine whether the alleged conduct occurred.

Meanwhile, the episode reopens conversations about responsibility, respect, and boundaries in situations where fame amplifies the impact of every word and gesture.

Awaiting official updates, the case remains in its initial phase, marked by conflicting accounts and constant media attention that demands, more than ever, journalistic rigor.

Whatever the outcome, it could set a precedent on how to legally manage family conflicts exposed to public scrutiny, reminding us that even the most well-known figures resort to the courts to seek redress.