R1 BREAKING — Rachel Maddow Just Issued a Public Demand to CBS After Colbert’s Shocking Removal

teo1233 minutes ago

0 0 4 minutes read

Rachel Maddow took to Nicolle Wallace’s The Best People podcast this week with a sharp rebuke of Paramount’s decision to cancel The Late Show With Stephen Colbert — a move the network has repeatedly described as a financial necessity.

Maddow called the cancellation a “capitulation” and urged Paramount to reverse course, framing the situation as evidence of political pressure and claiming the CBS post merger culture has been a “huge embarrassment.”

Stephen Colbert interviews Jimmy Kimmel – YouTube, The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

“Maybe you can now see where in history you’re going to end up, and now’s your chance to try to alter that and try to get right,” Maddow said. “And I think that a lot of institutions are in that same boat.”

But here’s the reality Maddow leaves out — and what mainstream outlets like Variety downplay entirely: The Late Show reportedly loses CBS around $40 million per year, despite being the “highest-rated” show in a late-night landscape that has collapsed across the board.

Stephen Colbert dances around with human needles – YouTube, The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

Ratings for Colbert might be the “highest,” technically, but they have fallen so far industry-wide that even the top spot cannot sustain a program with Colbert’s enormous production cost.

This isn’t political. It’s arithmetic.

And Paramount’s leadership appears to have decided it no longer wants to bankroll a legacy show bleeding tens of millions annually.

Maddow’s Claims — and the Facts That Undercut Them

In her interview, Maddow argued that Paramount’s decision was “absolutely transparent,” dismissing the financial explanation and instead positioning the cancellation as a form of capitulation to political forces.

“It was absolutely transparent what CBS and Paramount were doing with getting rid of Stephen Colbert,” she said. “‘Oh, it’s a financial decision.’ Right, because having the highest-rated late-night show in America for years is somehow financially unsustainable now when it wasn’t before?”

Rachel Maddow speaks during her show on MSNBC – YouTube, MSNBC

She went so far as to claim that “Trump-connected oligarchs” have influenced the company and objected to the appointment of Bari Weiss as CBS News editor-in-chief — describing Weiss as a “right-wing blogger.”

This, too, ignores key context.

While Maddow and Variety both frame Weiss as a “right-wing blogger,” Weiss is widely recognized as a centrist liberal apostate who has publicly broken with both political extremes. She is known for criticizing excesses on the Left and the Right — a nuance curiously absent from Variety’s description and Maddow’s commentary. Whatever one thinks of Weiss, the “right-wing” label simply doesn’t match her track record.

Bari Weiss addresses The Free Press working with Paramount – YouTube, The Free Press

It’s also a distraction from the real issue: Paramount is evaluating its books, not its ideology.

Colbert’s Show Has Been Losing Money for Years

Paramount and CBS have been explicit that The Late Show was canceled for financial reasons. While Maddow scoffs at the idea that a high-rated show could be “unsustainable,” industry analysts have confirmed the hard truth ad nauseam since the announcement of the show’s cancellation:

The Late Show reportedly loses $40 million annually
Production costs have risen sharply
Advertisers have retreated from late-night across all networks
Ratings declines have crippled profitability industry-wide

Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert laughing together – YouTube, The Late Show With Stephen Colbert

This isn’t unique to Colbert. Late-night as a format has been shrinking for nearly a decade, accelerated by viewer fragmentation and the politicization of monologues — a shift that turned once-broad-appeal shows into narrow-audience commentary platforms.

The outcome has been a shrinking viewer pool that can’t support legacy costs.

Paramount choosing to stop the financial bleeding is not only logical — it would be irresponsible not to.

Late-Night’s Collapse Was Long in the Making

Maddow frames Colbert’s cancellation as some sort of ideological purge. But the collapse of late-night viewership predates any recent political reshuffling and certainly predates any CBS–Paramount transition. The format began eroding years ago when shows that once drew mass audiences rebranded themselves as nightly political soapboxes largely catering to a single party’s base.

That model no longer works.

Stephen Colbert at the Emmys gestures with a fist

Stephen Colbert speaks at the 2025 Emmys – YouTube, Television Academy

And Paramount, fresh off an expensive merger, and in the midst of a $108 billion hostile takeover attempt of Warner Bros. Discovery, isn’t in a position to keep hemorrhaging money in the name of nostalgia.

Maddow Wants to Ignore Reality

Maddow is a veteran communicator, and she knows how to frame a story. But her argument rests on the assumption that Paramount should ignore market realities, ignore profitability, and ignore the downward spiral of late-night television because reversing the cancellation would symbolically satisfy her political cohort.

Paramount, however, must satisfy shareholders — not cable pundits.

David Ellison in an interview with Bloomberg – YouTube, Bloomberg Podcasts

Her attempt to recast a business decision as a political morality play may make for compelling podcast commentary, but it does little to address the very real financial challenges that prompted the cancellation.

Paramount’s Future Doesn’t Include Bloated Legacy Shows

Colbert’s final episode is set to air in May 2026. Unless Paramount dramatically alters its strategy — which appears unlikely — the show’s end will be part of a broader shift away from expensive, low-return programming.

Maddow can urge, demand, and pressure for her buddy and odd look-alike Colbert — but Paramount’s leadership has the numbers, and the numbers don’t lie.