BE.BREAKING NEWS: When [email protected] T.r.u.m.p closed the border “PERMANENTLY” to immigrants, Crockett stood up to strongly fight back to protect American humanity

BREAKING NEWS: When Trump closed the border “PERMANENTLY” to immigrants, Crockett stood up to strongly defend American humanity
On November 27, 2025, President Donald Trump shocked public opinion when he announced a permanent suspension of immigration from “third world” countries. This decision, according to Trump, was to protect national security and prioritize the interests of the American people, but immediately met with strong opposition from lawmakers, most notably Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett, who said that this policy went against America’s humanitarian values ​​and long-standing immigration spirit.

During a press conference at the White House, Trump emphasized that this move was necessary to control the flow of immigrants and prevent potential risks to national security. He argued that current controls were not strong enough, and that accepting immigrants from countries with political, economic or conflict-ridden countries could create “holes” in the system of border protection and homeland security. “We cannot open our borders indefinitely and put all the risks on the American people,” Trump stressed.

However, this statement was immediately strongly opposed by Crockett. The congressman asserted that Trump’s policy not only affects immigrants, but also undermines the humane identity of the United States. In a speech before the House of Representatives, Crockett called this “an American mistake” and emphasized that the United States is strong thanks to the diversity and dedication of immigrants, many of whom come from countries considered “third world”. Crockett also asked: “Are we protecting security, or are we denying millions of people the opportunity to live simply because of where they were born?”

Public reaction is clearly divided into two streams. One side supports Trump, saying that this decision helps the US prioritize citizens and reduce pressure on the welfare, health and security systems. The other side criticizes the policy as arbitrary and inhumane, warning that this could be a step that will discredit the US in the international arena and negatively affect the immigrant community that has lived and worked in the US.

Political experts analyze that the conflict between Trump and Crockett reflects a fundamental contradiction in the way the US defines “national values”: one side emphasizes security, citizen rights and border control; the other side emphasizes humanitarian responsibilities, life opportunities and human rights. Balancing these two factors has always been a hotly debated topic in the US, but Trump’s decision with its “permanent” nature has made the debate more intense than ever.

Many observers believe that the announcement to stop immigration from third world countries will have a profound impact on the US economy, agriculture and labor market, where many industries depend on immigrant labor. In addition, this policy also raises questions about the US’s spirit of openness and commitment to human rights in the international context.

Meanwhile, Crockett and like-minded congressmen are campaigning to control the decision through the House of Representatives, calling for applying restrictive measures while maintaining humanitarian programs. She stressed that the US needs to protect its citizens, but cannot lose the humanitarian soul that is the foundation of the country.

The event became a focus on social networks, with millions of people participating in the debate on security, immigration, and human rights. The hashtag #AnNinhHayNhanDao quickly went viral, with many touching stories about immigrants and warnings from international experts.

In short, the conflict between Trump and Crockett is not just a personal confrontation, but also reflects America’s long-standing debate about the balance between security and humanity. The decision to suspend permanent immigration from third-world countries has created a significant political turning point, opening up many questions about the future of immigration, national image and humanitarian values ​​in American society.